Selecting the appropriate UI framework for iOS app development may significantly impact the app’s process, user experience, and quality. Apple offers two different UI frameworks: SwiftUI and UIKit. Each framework has its unique features, benefits, and drawbacks. It is essential to dive into a deeper understanding of both frameworks to gain insight into the best framework to work with depending on a wide range of factors. Therefore, this article will give you an overview of SwiftUI and UIKit, review their features, and compare their strengths and weaknesses to understand which UI framework is best for your iOS app development requirements. Let’s dive right in.

Understanding SwiftUI

With the help of the user interface toolkit SwiftUI, we may create apps declaratively. This is a fancy way of stating that we tell SwiftUI how we want our UI to appear and function, and it works out the details when the user interacts with it.

Before iOS 13, developers used imperative UI, which is the best way to understand declarative UI. When a button is hit in an imperative user interface, we may make a function run, read a value, and display a label. We alter the user interface’s appearance and functionality frequently depending on the situation.

Most issues with imperative user interfaces (UI) are related to state, another fancy word for “values we store in our code.” We must monitor the condition of our code and ensure that our user interface appropriately reflects it.

How understanding SwiftUI will help you work with developers.

As a designer, understanding SwiftUI can help you communicate more effectively with app developers and ensure your designs are accurately implemented in the final build. With a basic understanding of how SwiftUI works, you can better understand the framework’s capabilities and limitations and how to design for it.

Designers can collaborate with app development teams more successfully in several ways if they have a solid grasp of SwiftUI. Because SwiftUI is meant to be simple to use and understand, designers already familiar with the framework may rapidly produce mockups and prototypes that nearly match the finished result. Developers may benefit significantly from this as it helps them better grasp the design requirements and provides a clear picture of the designer’s goals.

The foundation of SwiftUI is the idea of modular, reusable parts. By comprehending these elements, designers may produce designs that are easier to scale and maintain, saving developers time and effort throughout the development process.

If designers have a deeper understanding of SwiftUI’s technological constraints and capabilities, they may make better judgments and produce ideas that are easier for developers to implement.

For instance, your app’s layout may be designed using SwiftUI’s built-in layout system, or its vast array of customizable controls and views can be used to construct the user interface components. Understanding these components’ functions and customization options can help you create your app’s user interface and explain your design choices to developers.

But we also realize that paradigm shifts and process changes take time. Working within platform limitations after using Figma’s infinite drag-and-drop design feature might be challenging. Fortunately, there is an easy substitute. Judo is a visual canvas that assists developers and designers in producing code for their SwiftUI projects that are ready for production.

Advantages of SwiftUI

• Simplified syntax

SwiftUI code is more straightforward for developers to comprehend and maintain since it is frequently shorter and easier to read than UIKit code. Because of its declarative style, SwiftUI enables developers to explain the user interface and its functionality. This method streamlines code, improving its readability and intuitiveness.

• Built-in features

SwiftUI makes integrating contemporary UI components into your program easier by incorporating built-in support for accessibility, dark mode, internationalization, and other features.

• Live Preview

The development process may be significantly accelerated by using the SwiftUI live preview functionality. This functionality lets developers see changes to their code in real time without rebuilding and running the application.

• Multi-platform support

Using less platform-specific code, SwiftUI enables you to design user interfaces (UIs) for iOS, macOS, watchOS, and tvOS with a more unified appearance and feel across many platforms.

• High-level API

The declarative structure of the SwiftUI API makes it straightforward.

The abstraction is enough for Apple to provide compatibility across all its platforms. There is one interface for everyone, even though, for instance, the UI would have needed to be modified between UIKit and AppKit.

Because of its ease of use and closeness to other frameworks (such as React, Flutter, and Jetpack Compose), developers from other platforms may experiment with native programming on Apple systems.

• Interoperability

One of SwiftUI’s main advantages is its interoperability. Its seamless integration with UIKit and AppKi allows for progressive use.

The current limitations of this immature technology can be addressed by adding UIKit code to a new application with a declarative interface via UIView Representable or by adding SwiftUI code to an existing application via UIHosting Controller.

• Interactive Canvas

It is a terrific asset because of its extensive interaction with Xcode. Thanks to the Previews, you can see how a SwiftUI view is rendered immediately. Any modification to the code instantly reloads the screen, allowing for interaction. Better yet, rendering on many screen combinations simultaneously is feasible.

• Automatic Accessibility

SwiftUI makes it easier to develop accessible user interfaces by automatically applying accessibility settings without needing significant extra coding.

Disadvantages of SwiftUI

• Compatibility

Because SwiftUI requires iOS 13 or later, your app may not be able to operate on earlier devices or platforms.

• Maturity

Despite its constant development, SwiftUI is still relatively young in comparison to UIKit. It still has a smaller knowledge base, fewer resources, and sporadic framework limits to overcome.

• Limited Deployment

The only operating systems that support SwiftUI are iOS 13 and later, macOS 10.15 and later, watchOS six and later, and tvOS 13 and later. Because of this, SwiftUI-based applications can only be used with more recent OS versions.

• Third-Party Library Support

UIKit has a more comprehensive ecosystem of third-party libraries than SwiftUI. Therefore, developers may have to design their own solutions for specific features.

Understanding UIKit

Since the introduction of the iPhone, iOS app developers have utilized Apple’s tried-and-true UIKit framework. It is developed with Objective-C and Swift programming languages and offers a variety of event handling, drawing tools, and user interface components for making dynamic and rich iOS applications.

Writing code that outlines the precise steps for creating and managing user interface (UI) components and their interactions with the underlying system is known as imperative programming. UIKit uses a hierarchical view structure to manage UI elements, manage user interactions, and provide feedback through modal view transitions or animations.

Advantages of UIKit

• Maturity

With its extensive history, UIKit has established a solid reputation for dependability, performance, and stability.

• Comprehensive resources

Because of its long history, UIKit has many tutorials, documentation, and third-party libraries that make locating help and solutions for nearly any problem or need simpler.

• Full control over UI

UIKit provides fine-grained control over UI elements and event handling, enabling developers to create fully customized and intricate user interfaces.

• Compatibility

Because it is compatible with previous iterations of iOS, UIKit has been the cornerstone of iOS app development for many years, enabling developers to reach a larger audience with their apps.

• A wide range of UI components

UIkit’s extensive collection of pre-built UI components, such as buttons, search bars, and tables, resolves most of the problems developers encounter while creating iOS user interfaces. As a result, fewer bespoke UI design components are required—most of them are already there.

• Extensive documentation and community support

Because of its lengthy history and broad acceptance, UIkit has amassed a sizable and vibrant development community. Starting with Apple’s official documentation and continuing through YouTube lessons and other websites, you have access to a wealth of information and tools.

Disadvantages of UIKit

• Verbose code

Maintaining the UIkit code that governs and controls the views might be increasingly difficult as your application gets more complicated. It becomes increasingly challenging to govern flow and app state without overusing the view controllers when your app has multiple screens.

Properly organizing and modularizing your code can, however, help you avoid this hazard and write less problematic code.

• Lack of built-in support for modern design patterns

UIkit does not natively support modern design principles like dependency injection and reactive programming. These design features are popular, even expected, in current apps, but developers are forced to either create their solutions or rely on third-party frameworks.

• Development speed

Due to the more verbose code and imperative methodology, UIKit development may be slower than SwiftUI, particularly for intricate or customized user interfaces.

• Boilerplate Code

Using imperative programming in UIKit results in a more significant amount of boilerplate code. Unlike SwiftUI’s declarative approach, developers might have to write more lines of code to accomplish the same goals.

• Steep Learning Curve

Particularly for novices, UIKit may have a more challenging learning curve. Because of the framework’s intricacy, developers might need more time learning them.

As you can see, UIKit and SwiftUI both have advantages and disadvantages, and we’ll keep exploring their features.

• SwiftUI and UIKit features.

In this section, we’ll give you a brief rundown of the key characteristics that set SwiftUI and UIKit apart so you can see how they differ in approach and what they can do.

SwiftUI features

• Declarative Syntax

Because of its declarative style, SwiftUI lets you specify the desired user interface and behavior and takes care of the rest. This improves code readability and maintainability.

• Built-in support for modern UI patterns

SwiftUI’s pre-built components and views simplify the implementation of features like dark mode, accessibility, internationalization, and adaptable layout.

• Live preview

Developing and improving UI designs is simpler using SwiftUI’s live viewing of UI changes, which eliminates the need to launch the app on a device or simulator.

• Swift-only

SwiftUI is incompatible with Objective-C-based applications since it was created specifically for Swift, Apple’s contemporary programming language.

• Compatibility

SwiftUI is only compatible with iOS 13 and later; therefore, apps designed for older iOS versions cannot utilize it.

• Views and Modifiers

With SwiftUI’s abundance of pre-built views and modifiers, creating intricate interfaces with little code is simple. Examples of views are Text, Button, and List.

• Combine Framework Integration

SwiftUI facilitates reactive and asynchronous programming through its smooth integration with the Combine framework. This is essential for effectively managing data flow and modifications. Combine simplifies complex tasks like processing data, responding to network requests, and controlling state changes in your application.

• Gesture Recognition

Gestures like a tap, drag, and swipe make gesture identification simple with SwiftUI, and linking gestures to views makes incorporating interaction into your program simple.

• Animations

It’s easy to create animations in SwiftUI. SwiftUI takes care of the rest, and you can add animations to view changes with the .animation() modifier.

• Data Binding

SwiftUI guarantees that the underlying data model is always reflected in your user interface by providing two-way data binding. This minimizes boilerplate code and streamlines data maintenance.

SwiftUI prioritizes accessibility. It offers resources for developing inclusive apps that people with different requirements may use.

UIKit Features

• Imperative approach

Developers must actively manage the UI state while using UIKit’s imperative coding approach, which results in more intricate and verbose code.

• Extensive API

With a wide array of APIs and UI components covering almost every facet of creating an iOS app, UIKit allows developers greater control over the user interface and its behavior.

• Objective-C and Swift compatibility

Because UIKit is compatible with Objective-C and Swift, developers may use old code as necessary and work with both languages.

• Mature and stable

For over 10 years, UIKit has been the main UI framework for creating iOS apps. It is a seasoned and dependable option supported by a sizable community and a wealth of resources.

• Backward compatibility

UIKit is the sole option for apps aimed at older devices and operating systems, as it is compatible with previous iterations of iOS.

Factors to consider while choosing the proper UI framework

There are essential factors to explore when selecting between SwiftUI and UIKit for your upcoming Web application or mobile app development project: overall complexity, ease of learning, compatibility with standard technology, handling and resolving common issues, and adaptability with emerging technologies.

• Ease of learning

Learning a decent user interface framework should be simple for a junior or mid-level software engineer. We are not discussing a straightforward “Hello World” program. Input validation, user state management, error handling, site navigation control, and connecting to back ends such as server-side components or RESTful Web services should all be simple operations. The UI development framework may be too complex for a junior developer to grasp if they cannot rapidly assemble a basic prototype that accomplishes these tasks.

• Overall complexity

A UI development framework is intended to reduce the tedious effort of creating corporate applications. This entails streamlining processes like back-end integration and error management. Making things simple for the developer has many benefits, but the developer should never be unaware of what is happening behind the scenes. Troubleshooting complex issues becomes more challenging if the underlying technology is very complex.

Frameworks should handle experience-specific problems in addition to streamlining everyday application development activities like input validation and exception handling.

Additionally, after learning the framework, a developer should have a firm grasp of its functionality. The framework itself may be too complicated if a developer uses a certain Web or UI development framework but finds it difficult to comprehend what’s happening behind the scenes.

One practical test is to check how effectively a mid-level developer can replicate a reasonably tricky section of an existing program using a UI framework your company is considering using. The framework is overly complicated if there are significant implementation issues or if several problems are resolved without the developer knowing why or how they were resolved.

• Interoperability with standard technology

One of the most crucial aspects of building an application is considering the entire application lifecycle management process, which includes continuous maintenance. While a company may not always be able to locate a developer with expertise in a framework, developers will always be familiar with standard technologies like HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and Java. An organization’s capacity to create and maintain code may be in danger if a UI development framework fails the interoperability test, such as when a developer tries to implement and integrate standard JavaScript or makes rendering problems while utilizing Java Standard Tag Libraries. Good user interface frameworks are easy to combine with current web development tools.

• Ability to handle and solve common problems

Frameworks should handle experience-specific problems in addition to streamlining everyday application development chores like input validation and exception handling. The number of websites still having issues with bookmarks and the return button in production today is astounding. A web framework should address the difficulties of resolving these kinds of state management and user interface navigation problems.

• Adaptability with emerging technologies

New programming trends will inevitably arise, and frameworks for UI development must be flexible enough to rapidly and readily adjust to them. While Ajax is now widely used, it was a revolutionary technology, and not all frameworks support asynchronous interactions. Today, many sites seek to give their consumers a single-page interface (SPI) experience. Mobile support was another demand that surfaced that many frameworks struggled to adapt to. Examine how quickly a UI framework accommodates changes, offers tools for producing SPI sites, or adjusts for mobile development before implementing it. Your company may be left in the dark the next time there is a significant change in the industry if the framework is sluggish to adapt.

• Development speed

Think about the resources and schedule for your project. With its declarative syntax and live preview capabilities, SwiftUI may speed up UI development, whereas UIKit could take longer and involve more work.

• Team expertise

Assess your team’s knowledge and familiarity with both frameworks. A team adept in one framework will probably use it more effectively and produce more.

• App requirements

Examine your app’s needs, considering features and UI complexity. Depending on your needs, one framework may be more appropriate for your project than another.

Conclusion

When choosing between SwiftUI and UIKit, consider your objectives as an iOS developer and what’s hot in the employment market. SwiftUI is gaining popularity for new applications, even though UIKit has been available for a while.

To keep things simple, you might have to remain with UIKit if you’re working on an already-existing project. However, understanding how to work on it might offer an advantage if you’re developing something from scratch or joining a team focusing exclusively on SwiftUI.

Additionally, consider your preferred methods of learning and working. Some individuals find SwiftUI easier to learn since it is a more recent version and has a simpler operation method.

However, stick with the classic UIKit look if you’re accustomed to it.

However, you are not required to choose just one. Knowledge of both UIKit and SwiftUI increases your alternatives and development versatility. You could learn both at once or begin with UIKit and go to SwiftUI later.

The choice between UIKit and SwiftUI ultimately comes down to your objectives, the projects you’re working on, and personal preference. Finding the framework that best suits your abilities and career path is crucial because each has advantages and disadvantages.

Back to You!

Confused between choosing SwiftUI vs UIKit? Get in touch with our iOS development company – Aalpha Information Systems – and get consultation at no cost.