Site icon Aalpha

Swift vs. Objective C Difference

Swift vs Objective C Difference

Are you an iOS developer interested in developing iOS applications and mobile apps? Are you confused about which programming language to use to achieve your goals? Well, many people are facing the same challenges. But we can’t forget to say that Swift and Objective C are the primary programming languages one will run to when they want to do iOS development. The challenge comes in choosing the most preferable.

Not until 2014, when Swift was introduced, Objective-C was the sole programming language for developing Apple apps. Swift is a modern language with an easy-to-understand syntax, making it popular with iOS developers. This article gives you the facts about the two languages.

A Closer Look at Objective-C

Objective C programming language was established in the 1980s by Tom Love and Brad Cox. With prior Smalltalk knowledge, they worked at ITT Corporation’s Programming Technology Center, an institution that helped them develop Objective C. This language falls under object-oriented programming language we use to develop different software and applications, including OS X and iOS. It is an advanced version of the C programming language; it does everything C performs and more. The advantage you enjoy with this language is the capability to dynamically load code; thus, it is easier to develop both small, lightweight applications and larger, complex apps.

Love and Cox created the language with class libraries before developing PPI, which targeted the commercialization of their product. NeXT acquired Objective C, changed rights to StepStone, before transitioning to Apple in 1996.

Objective-C Features

Objective-C, a programming language, comes out uniquely with amazing features and is instrumental in developing OS X and iOS apps. Some of the features include:

Advantages of Objective-C

You will enjoy several benefits once you go the Objective C way as a programming language. Some of them include:

Shortcomings of Objective C

We have seen that the language has several strengths. It has a few shortcomings:

An Overview of Swift

Apple developed Swift language. It first existed in 2014 but officially came to the public in 2015. Reading and writing using Swift is easy. It is a modern language, meaning it is resilient to errors. The other unique thing about this language is that it is open-source and applies to different platforms. You can use it to create software for tvOS, Linux, macOS, watchOS, and iOS. It is also compatible with Objective C.

Features of Swift

You will be right to say that Swift is an improved innovation on C-based codes. It has unique features that make it an easy language to use in terms of reading and writing. Some of the features are:

Read: Design Patterns in Swift

Advantages of Swift Language

Let us check some of the benefits of Swift.

The shortcomings of Swift

No language lacks the downsides.

Good read: Swift Advantages and Disadvantages

Swift and Objective C Difference

Most of us like new and modern things and innovations since they come with new features that resonate well with us. Swift throws in the towel by being a newer language, coming with many features as compared to Objective C. They are both programming languages hosted on the Apple ecosystem, and you use them to develop apps for iOS, tvOS, watchOS, and macOS. As you study them, you will note that they exhibit key differences in performance, syntax, and general coding experience. Let us compare the two languages.

Apple introduced Swift in 2014 and became a modern and user-friendly programming language. Its syntax is concise and cleaner compared to Objective C. Many consider it a more readable code, and maintenance is easy.

Objective C has a C-like syntax that is more verbose. The syntax is less intuitive to most programmers, and you will note the square brackets’ usage in calling methods.

Swift is more of a static type (statically typed language), implying that you determine or know the variable types at compile-time. The compiler will automatically infer the variable type based on the value, meaning there is no need to explicitly declare the variable type. The chances of making errors are less; it has a cleaner and more concise code and supports type interface.

Objective C is more of a dynamic type (dynamically typed language). You determine the variable types at the runtime. You will experience runtime errors if you don’t handle the types appropriately.

The design of Swift allows it to work seamlessly with Objective C. Swift projects can use Objective C frameworks and libraries and vice versa. Such ensures a smooth transition to Swift for the current Objective C codebases.

Objective C uses bridging headers in calling Swift code, but the interoperability is one way. Unlike Objective C, Swift easily includes Objective C code within its projects.

The design of Swift focused more on safety. The presence of type safety and optionals features assist in avoiding null pointer errors and any bug that may occur. ARC makes it better in memory management.

Objective C has a high likelihood of experiencing runtime errors like null pointer dereferencing. Programmers must be keen on managing memory utilizing manual reference counting.

Apple has placed more finances in developing Swift, which developers have rapidly adopted. Its community is growing on a daily basis and contains Swift Package Manager, which acts as a modern package manager.

Objective C is still in use, but most of its tooling and the community have been dwarfed by the popularity of Swift.

With a modern design and highly optimized, Swift has better performance. Execution of Swift code is faster, and there is lower memory overhead.

The dynamic nature of Objective C can make it experience performance overhead.

Conclusion

A lot of reasons point to choosing Swift as the go-to language. Beginners find it easy to read and write with a more concise and understandable code. There are fewer errors when using Swift, and you don’t have to worry about memory management. The relevance of Objective C is still visible, especially in maintaining legacy codebases or when one needs to work with older frameworks and libraries. The language choice will depend on the project requirements and how familiar a person is with a given language.

Any queries? Connect with our mobile app development company – Aalpha information systems!

Also read: Swift vs React Native

Exit mobile version